era, intertwining a vast cast of characters with a scathing critique of the British legal system—particularly the Court of Chancery. This paper examines the novel’s dual narrative structure, which alternates between the omniscient third-person perspective and the first-person account of Esther Summerson, to explore themes of justice, bureaucracy, class inequality, and moral responsibility. The analysis also highlights how Dickens employs satire and realism to expose the inefficiencies and human costs of institutional corruption. Furthermore, the fog that permeates London in the novel is interpreted as a powerful symbol of moral and legal obscurity. Ultimately, "Bleak House" serves not only as a compelling literary work but also as a profound social commentary that remains relevant in discussions of legal reform and social justice today.